I probably received more feedback on my Obama mortgage plan comments — both here at this blog and in other venues — than on any other topic. Good. I’m glad to see people are engaged on this issue.
Judging by a few of the comments, however, I think I need to elaborate on one point: I understand that foreclosure can be a traumatic experience. And I am not suggesting that anyone who loses his or her home to foreclosure just be thrown out on the street, given no aid whatsoever, and be forced to live under a bridge. What we do need to do, however, is focus less on keeping people in unaffordable, purchased homes encumbered by an unsustainable debt burden — and more on just ensuring people have shelter, even if that shelter is RENTED shelter.
For some reason, RENT became a four-letter word in recent years. That shouldn’t be the case. There is nothing wrong with renting a house, condo, or apartment, if you can’t afford to buy — or can’t afford to stay in your home because you have a mortgage that is killing you, or that is secured by an asset whose value has plunged. Perhaps instead of providing huge subsidies to the mortgage industry, we should consider directing money toward making the transition into more affordable rental housing easier. Just a thought off the top of my head, but we could provide a Housing Opportunity Voucher that would cover the cost of first month’s rent, last month’s rent, and security deposit for people who lose their homes to foreclosure, but don’t have enough money to cover the initial costs associated with finding rental shelter.
Stated another way, the reality that often gets obscured in this debate is that people who lose their OWNED homes have plenty of housing alternatives. We are not a country that’s starved of housing units, be they single-family properties, condos, or apartments. And we are not in a market where former borrowers are going to have to pay through the eyeballs to get a new place.
Just consider: The nationwide rental vacancy rate was 10.1% in the fourth quarter of 2008, up from 9.6% a year earlier and just shy of the 2004 high of 10.4%. That level was the highest in the 49 years the Census Bureau has been tracking the data. Figures from the National Multi-Housing Council’s confirm the rental market is extremely soft. The NMHC’s market tightness index came in at a paltry 11 in the January survey, down from 24 a quarter earlier and the lowest in seven years.
Bottom line: Former homeowners should have no trouble finding rental space at great rates. In the meantime, for those who can’t, we could re-direct more money from mortgage subsidies to programs that strengthen our nation’s safety net (unemployment insurance, rental vouchers, funding for community groups that feed, clothe, and shelter the homeless, and so on).
Related posts:
- Details of Obama plan released, with my comments The earlier post I put up was based on media reports. Now, the Obama administration has officially released its plan...
- Foreclosure moratoriums abound … but do they work? Plus, more on modifications The “foreclosure moratorium” wave sweeping through the mortgage world continues to pick up momentum. Just today, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley...
- What’s $1.75 trillion among friends, right? The Obama administration has released its big-picture budget outlook for 2009 and beyond. The big headline: The U.S. government is...


{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I rented in Raleigh,NC and later bought a home which I kept for 18 years. Then I moved to Oregon where I bought a home I kept for 8 years. I now live live in Las Vegas, NV. Thank God I rent. I never did buy a home down here, renting seemed a better option. I have been renting for 5 years. I guess RENT is a four letter word only if you are younger than 40.
re housing voucher: totally agree, instead of propping up the interests which set this global debacle intrain, give escape assistance directly to those who have been hit /exploited/pawns. this moves a lot of people on. Does not focus on maintaining and increasing credit. Taxpayers fund and will reap the inflation or hyper inflation to come from the money printing and which will allow govt debt to be worthless and social security payments savings etc also worthless.
REMEMBER
In many instances rent is as high or higher than a house
payment, no capital gain and no tax relief.
jim corbin