Mike Larson - Weiss Research expert on housing, interest rates, mortgages, and consumer finance.

Treasuries mauled as my “no free lunch” theme gains traction

by Mike Larson on January 23, 2009

in Commodities, Currency Analysis, Debt, Interest Rate News

I’ve been hammering home a clear point for several weeks and months – there is no such thing as a “free lunch.” You can’t simply bail out anyone and everyone, especially when you’re a debtor nation, and expect your creditors to just grin and bear it forever. Click here for more of my views on this topic.

Now investors seem to be waking up. Treasuries have been getting mauled this week, losing value every single trading day this week (Long bond futures are going for around 128 21/32 vs. 136 7/32 last Friday). Yields on 10-year Treasury Notes have shot up to 2.68% from their December 30 low of 2.06%.

As a refresher, we’re flooding the world with hundreds of billions of dollars in Treasuries to fund our ever-growing deficit. Next week alone, the government is selling $40 billion in two-year notes, $30 billion in five-year notes, and $8 billion in 20-year inflation-protected securities. Total borrowing needs may hit $2.5 TRILLION this fiscal year, according to Goldman Sachs, up from the firm’s previous forecast for $2 trillion in issuance.

As if that weren’t enough, incoming Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner just fired a shot across China’s bow by saying the Chinese government is “manipulating” its currency, the yuan. The Obama administration believes that China should allow the yuan to strengthen against the buck.

There’s just one problem: China is the world’s biggest holder of our government debt, with $682 billion as of November. Geithner’s comments could lead to a new round of financial and diplomatic tension between China and the U.S. It may even lead China to retaliate by dumping bonds.

One other market signal that’s worth mentioning: Silver and gold prices are rising even though the dollar is climbing. For the longest time, the metals traded inversely to the dollar. When the dollar rose, the metals fell, and vice versa. But that is now starting to change.

I have a thesis that might explain what’s going on: Global investors are starting to sour on government debt all around the world. They can see that the cost of bailing out banks and economies here in the U.S., in Asia, and in Europe is spiraling out of control. They know that means governments are going to be issuing trillions of dollars in new debt, driving down the price of existing securities. Result: They’re flocking to alternative stores of value — including silver and gold.

The decline in bond prices says that thesis is right on target. So does the rise in metals prices. And so does the surging cost of insuring against SOVEREIGN debt defaults. On example: Credit default swaps on U.S. 5-year debt just hit 74.9 basis points, or $74,900 for every $10 million in Treasury debt. That’s the most expensive it has ever been to buy insurance against a U.S. default, and a big rise from only 6 basis points in early 2008. CDS costs on European and U.K. debt are climbing, too.

Are those levels still extremely low? Yes. But the trend is clear. It offers yet another warning sign that the market’s appetite for funding unlimited bailouts with multi-trillion dollar price tags is waning. Policymakers better sit up and take notice before these minor market tremors grow into something far more damaging.


Related posts:
  1. Tsunami of Treasury issuance next week The Treasury Department just announced how much debt it’s going to sell next week. Get a load of these figures:...
  2. Dollar debasement keeps on keeping on The dollar’s collapse is gathering steam in early trading today. The broad-based Dollar Index is down 38 ticks to 76.95...
  3. Weak 5-year auction leads to bond selling In the wake of the failed U.K. auction of 40-year gilts, the bond market is paying close attention to this...

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Bob Spencer 01.23.09 at 2:13 PM

I want to comment about “Why Washington Should Take a Bike Ride.”

That piece is a great way to make your point. While I was reading it, I thought of another point that Washington and, really, most Americans might want to consider.

The nation’s economic health and personal financial security are intertwined with many factors. We need to choose the most important factors and take care of them.

What if a bike costs you $850? But, what if you have a heart disease, a stroke or dementia? How much will any of those cost you? Riding a bike often enough can significantly help prevent those bad and expensive health problems.

What if Washington tries to pay for those health problems with Medicare or whatever?

I think everyone should ride frequently—Their financial health may depend on it. The nation’s economic health may also be much better.

That lunch is not free when you have to pay for the consequences of not burning what you eat.

Ride frequently!!

Bob Spencer

2 Vee Wong 01.23.09 at 7:16 PM

Mike, I am glad that I have been reading Weiss Research for months now. I learned a lot. One thing tho, as you indicated in your bike thesis, that some assistance is needed, but what? With prices continue to trend down, the balance sheets of individual and aggregate of individuals are out of sync. You can allow the foreclosures or you can extend the repayment period, but the asset value is no longer there, not until house prices move backed up, and that is longtime coming. Is devaluing the USD the solution, as Larry advocated? Would that be enough to balance the assets and debts?

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

I agree to the Terms and Conditions of this blog.

Previous post: RealtyTrac: 2.33 million foreclosures in 2008

Next post: Layoffs, CRE problems, and more